| Couple of gimmick ideas | |
|
+3bazz23-v2 ®™ invincibleILeak Joker-C4lum 7 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Sexton_hardcastle Admin
Posts : 2306 Join date : 2008-04-16 Location : Crewe
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Sun May 18, 2008 10:27 pm | |
| im not saying hes the new austin though, i was joking, thought youd see that one bazz lol | |
|
| |
bazz23-v2 ®™ Wrestling God
Posts : 1872 Join date : 2008-04-18
| |
| |
Sexton_hardcastle Admin
Posts : 2306 Join date : 2008-04-16 Location : Crewe
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Sun May 18, 2008 10:37 pm | |
| damn i read it as a sincere jibe at me. grrr. got a peach on that other site before though, he also admited he banned you the fool. its not funy but still, thought youd agree "APPRENTLY He is ovw champ they said hes spaz charcter was just a dream LMAO seems like that tv programme dallas to me" you can probably guess a response anyway cant you | |
|
| |
bazz23-v2 ®™ Wrestling God
Posts : 1872 Join date : 2008-04-18
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Sun May 18, 2008 10:43 pm | |
| - Sexton_hardcastle wrote:
got a peach on that other site before though, he also admited he banned you the fool. That's because he's Jericho, and Jericho can hold his own piss the tosser. - Sexton_hardcastle wrote:
- its not funy but still, thought youd agree
"APPRENTLY He is ovw champ they said hes spaz charcter was just a dream LMAO seems like that tv programme dallas to me"
you can probably guess a response anyway cant you Who's that about? Kennedy? | |
|
| |
Sexton_hardcastle Admin
Posts : 2306 Join date : 2008-04-16 Location : Crewe
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Sun May 18, 2008 10:45 pm | |
| eugene...
APPRENTLY He is ovw champ they said hes spaz charcter was just a dream LMAO seems like that tv programme dallas to me"
If only someone would shoot JR.
(dallas etc) | |
|
| |
the-gaffer Wrestling God
Posts : 1536 Join date : 2008-04-21 Location : Heveans honeymoon suite
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Mon May 19, 2008 10:59 am | |
| I dont like the Mic Check, I dont think it looks good and I dont think he can hit it fast or comfortably to make it look like a move that could win the World Title. I think Kennedy could tweak it a little though and just turn it into a Rock Bottom, I dont see the problem in using other peoples moves, its not like those guys were the first to use them either
The F5 the Razors Edge, a Torcher Rack and a spinning side walk slam are moves that could be used to give wrestlers more of a personal signiture | |
|
| |
bazz23-v2 ®™ Wrestling God
Posts : 1872 Join date : 2008-04-18
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Mon May 19, 2008 2:55 pm | |
| MVP's gimmick should be changed from being a jobber, to well, NOT being a jobber. | |
|
| |
the-gaffer Wrestling God
Posts : 1536 Join date : 2008-04-21 Location : Heveans honeymoon suite
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Mon May 19, 2008 3:34 pm | |
| MVP should start using the Razors Edge, he is one of the main guys who needs a new finisher | |
|
| |
Marty McFry Wrestling God
Posts : 1214 Join date : 2008-04-19 Age : 44 Location : South of reality
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Mon May 19, 2008 3:41 pm | |
| I don't know where this trend of people thinking the top guys need a move 'they can hit in a instant' comes from.
(good call on the Razors Edge - ive seen people suggest Umaga should use this) | |
|
| |
Sexton_hardcastle Admin
Posts : 2306 Join date : 2008-04-16 Location : Crewe
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas Mon May 19, 2008 4:56 pm | |
| turning back time a bit, i just saw mordecais debut in wwe and it really looked like it was setting him up for a big feud with taker, did this ever happen? and what caused that charactor to disapear? injury or the fact wwe wanted the vampire faction on ecw which failed completely.
seemed wwe wanted to trust thorne with making it to atleast the upper upper mid card, with a few big matches to showcase aswell.
but i didnt watch wwe at the time so, do your work.
and il say it again, MVP needs the ankle lock. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Couple of gimmick ideas | |
| |
|
| |
| Couple of gimmick ideas | |
|